How much does a training data generation vendor cost?
Cost depends on modality, complexity, and the level of expertise required. Abaka pricing can be structured around real unit economics: expert LLM Math/Coding work is $18/hr, STEM generalist labeling is $12/hr, dense captioning is $6/hr, image editing is $8/hr, and road lane annotation can be $3/km. For evaluation programs, examples include Red Teaming at $8/eval and Math Capabilities at $12/eval. We’ll scope your rubric, QA depth, and weekly volume to produce a transparent estimate tied to deliverables.
How fast can you start and deliver the first batch?
Most teams can start within days once scope and secure access are approved. A typical timeline is Day 0–3 for specs, guidelines, and environment setup, then Week 1–2 for a pilot batch and calibration, followed by Week 2–3 for production ramp. If you already have a stable taxonomy and sample data, we can accelerate by reusing your existing rubric and focusing the pilot on edge cases and QA calibration. Delivery cadence is then set weekly for predictable iteration.
What data modalities and export formats do you support?
Abaka supports text, RLHF, image, video, 3D/4D point cloud, LiDAR + camera fusion, and audio programs through Abaka Forge. We deliver common ML-friendly formats such as JSONL, CSV/TSV, COCO-style JSON, Pascal VOC XML, PNG masks, and synchronized manifests with metadata. If your pipeline requires specific schemas, we can map outputs to your required fields and add versioning so training and evaluation teams can reproduce experiments across releases.
What accuracy can you guarantee for generated training data?
Accuracy targets depend on the task definition, ambiguity level, and rubric maturity. Abaka is built to operate at high standards—99% accuracy is achievable for well-scoped tasks when guidelines are unambiguous and QA is properly layered. We implement gold sets, reviewer calibration, disagreement analysis, and multi-layer QA to prevent drift. Rather than relying on vague “quality checks,” we define acceptance criteria up front and report batch-level quality so you can decide whether to ship, revise, or expand the rubric.
How do you handle security, privacy, and compliance?
Abaka operates with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls and supports GDPR and CCPA requirements. We use strict NDAs, segregated secure pipelines, and controlled access so only authorized personnel see sensitive data. We also maintain full IP provenance and do not repurpose, resell, or share your datasets—your data remains exclusively yours. If your team needs additional governance steps (redaction, access logging, or role-based review lanes), we’ll design them into the workflow from Day 0–3.
Can you generate multilingual training data?
Yes. Abaka supports global programs across 50+ countries and can generate or annotate multilingual datasets for instruction following, classification, transcription, and evaluation. We align language-specific guidelines to your taxonomy and run reviewer calibration to ensure consistency across locales. Outputs include language and locale metadata to help you evaluate performance by region. For sensitive domains, we can restrict work to specific geographies and apply secure pipeline controls so multilingual expansion doesn’t increase compliance risk.
How are you different from other data labeling companies or marketplaces?
Abaka is designed as a trustworthy data partner for frontier AI, not a gig marketplace. You get a production system: rubric design, specialized annotators, multi-layer QA, and structured exports in Abaka Forge—plus compliance controls and full provenance. We also never build models that compete with you, and your data is exclusively yours—never repurposed, resold, or shared. This reduces IP and strategy risk while giving your team repeatable delivery and measurable quality.
How do change requests work if our taxonomy evolves mid-project?
Change is expected—new edge cases, new policy language, new labels. Abaka handles changes through versioned guidelines and controlled rollout: we update the rubric, retrain impacted annotators, and run a short recalibration batch to validate agreement. We can also backfill historical data if required, while keeping lineage clear so your training runs remain reproducible. Weekly reporting highlights where changes affect quality, volume, or timelines, helping you prioritize what to update versus what to defer.
Can we run a pilot before committing to a larger engagement?
Yes. We recommend a pilot to validate rubric clarity, QA depth, and operational fit. Pilots typically focus on the highest-value failure modes—hard negatives, safety behaviors, or domain correctness—so you can measure impact quickly. You’ll receive pilot outputs, QA reporting, and concrete recommendations for scaling. If the pilot meets acceptance criteria, we ramp capacity without changing the core workflow, ensuring the production phase doesn’t introduce drift or tooling surprises.
Who owns the data and can you reuse it for other customers?
You own your data and outputs. Abaka’s policy is explicit: we never build models that compete with you, and your data is exclusively yours—never repurposed, resold, or shared. We maintain provenance and lineage so you can audit what was collected or labeled, when it was processed, and under which guidelines. If you provide third-party inputs, we can help document permissions and ensure outputs are governed under your required contractual terms.
What tooling do you use for training data generation and QA?
Abaka uses Abaka Forge—an all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, training workflows, and production handoff across image, video, text, RLHF, and 3D/4D point cloud. The platform supports guideline management, reviewer workflows, and structured exports, with large-model automation that can accelerate parts of the pipeline by up to 50x. For teams that already have internal tools, we can integrate via export schemas and delivery manifests so you can keep your existing training stack.
What is the minimum project size you can take on?
Minimum size depends on complexity and the amount of setup required for secure access, rubrics, and QA. Many teams start with a focused pilot (for example, a few thousand items or a narrow set of high-risk edge cases) to validate workflow and quality gates. If you only need a small dataset, we’ll still apply the same principles—clear acceptance criteria, calibrated reviewers, and versioned guidelines—so the outputs remain reliable and reusable if you later scale to weekly production.