How much does a training data generation firm cost?
Pricing depends on modality, complexity, and QA depth, but Abaka provides concrete unit economics. For expert LLM work, Math/Coding annotation is $18/hr and STEM generalist work is $12/hr. For vision tasks, dense captioning can be $6/hr and image editing $8/hr, while autonomous driving road-lane labeling is $3/km. For model evaluation, red teaming can be $8/eval and defensive coding $15/eval. We’ll scope your dataset and recommend the most cost-effective mix.
How fast can you deliver training data after kickoff?
Most teams see a usable pilot quickly, then a first production-ready batch in 2–3 weeks once the label spec and QA gates are stable. Timelines depend on modality (text vs video vs 3D), target accuracy, and whether you need new collection. We structure delivery with a Day 0–3 scoping sprint, a Week 1–2 calibration pilot, and Week 2–3 production ramp. Weekly reporting keeps progress visible and prevents surprise delays from ambiguous edge cases.
What data formats and schemas can you deliver?
We deliver to your required schema, and we can adapt output formats to match your training stack and data lake. Common formats include JSONL and CSV for text and RLHF; COCO-like JSON and label maps for image; JSON/CSV timelines for video; and JSON plus point-cloud references for 3D/4D. We also provide dataset cards and QA manifests so your team can track label definitions, known limitations, and version history. Abaka Forge maintains traceability across every batch.
What accuracy level can you achieve for labeling?
Abaka targets 99% accuracy using multi-layer QA, golden sets, calibration sessions, and reviewer arbitration for edge cases. The exact achieved rate depends on how deterministic the task is and how well the spec can be operationalized (for example, subjective safety judgments require rubric alignment). We de-risk accuracy by running a pilot batch, measuring agreement and error patterns, then tightening guidelines before scaling. You get acceptance tests and clear escalation paths so errors are caught early rather than at the end.
How do you handle security and sensitive data?
Abaka operates with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 alignment and supports GDPR and CCPA requirements. We use strict NDAs, segregated secure pipelines, role-based access control, and audit-friendly delivery. For sensitive programs, we can limit access to dedicated teams and controlled workspaces, and we maintain clear provenance for assets and annotations. If your team has additional requirements (VPC setup, restricted export policies, or custom retention), we scope them during Day 0–3 and reflect them in the delivery plan.
Can you generate multilingual training data?
Yes—Abaka supports multilingual training data across 50+ countries, including localized instruction tuning, translation, and region-specific safety evaluations. We design workflows that keep semantics consistent across languages: shared rubrics, bilingual reviewer checks, and back-translation validation when appropriate. Your team can request language-specific metadata (locale, dialect, register) and consistent train/val/test splits. This approach prevents the common failure mode where each language becomes a separate project with incompatible labeling standards.
How are you different from other data labeling or dataset vendors?
Abaka is structured for frontier AI delivery: secure, versioned, and governance-driven, not ad-hoc task marketplaces. You get Abaka Forge as a system of record, multi-layer QA targeting 99% accuracy, and access to domain specialists for math, coding, medicine, and law. We also emphasize IP provenance and segregated pipelines, reducing compliance friction. Importantly, Abaka never builds models that compete with you—your data is exclusively yours and is never repurposed, resold, or shared.
What if our label spec changes mid-project?
Change is normal—what matters is managing it without blowing up timelines. Abaka runs spec governance with documented change requests, versioned guidelines, and impact estimates before modifications roll out. We can apply changes forward-only, or selectively reprocess affected subsets using targeted relabeling, depending on your training needs. Weekly calibration ensures new interpretations are adopted consistently across the team. This prevents “silent drift,” where different annotators apply different versions of the spec in the same batch.
Can we start with a pilot before committing to a full dataset?
Yes—pilots are often the fastest way to validate instructions, formats, and QA gates. A pilot typically includes a scoped sample set, initial guidelines, calibration feedback, and a quality report that highlights ambiguous edge cases. From there, we agree on acceptance thresholds and scale plans. Pilots are designed to be production-relevant: the outputs are delivered in final formats and can be used for training or evaluation, not just internal demos. This reduces risk before scaling volume.
Who owns the data and annotations you produce?
You do. Abaka’s operating model is built around customer exclusivity: your data is never repurposed, resold, or shared. We maintain provenance records and deliver versioned datasets and logs so you can demonstrate ownership and traceability internally. Because Abaka does not build models that compete with customers, there is no incentive to retain or reuse your artifacts beyond what’s required to deliver the project under your contractual terms. We can also align to your retention and deletion policies.
What tools do you use to manage and deliver datasets?
We use Abaka Forge—our all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, training handoff, and production delivery. Forge supports text, image, video, 3D/4D point cloud, and RLHF workflows, with role-based access, version control, QA tracking, and automation to accelerate repetitive steps. Teams use Forge to keep a single source of truth across dataset versions and to simplify audits and reproducibility. If you have existing tooling, we can deliver to your schema and integrate via exports.
What is the minimum project size you can support?
We support both small, high-signal pilots and large production programs. Minimum size depends on modality and complexity: for many teams, a 500–2,000 sample pilot is enough to validate rubrics, QA gates, and output formats. For RLHF or safety evaluation, you can start with a limited set of prompts and targeted failure modes. We’ll recommend a minimum that produces statistically useful signal without wasting budget—then scale once acceptance criteria and governance are stable.