How much does an ML data labeling agency cost?
Pricing depends on modality, complexity, and QA depth, but Abaka can align to real, concrete unit rates. Examples include LLM Math/Coding work at $18/hr, STEM generalist labeling at $12/hr, dense captioning at $6/hr, and road lane annotation at $3/km. Your final rate depends on guideline ambiguity, reviewer escalation requirements, and delivery cadence. We typically recommend a short pilot to validate the rubric and measure disagreement, then we lock a predictable pricing model for production batches.
How fast can you start and deliver the first labeled batch?
Most teams can start quickly once security and acceptance criteria are agreed. We typically use Day 0–3 to finalize scope, taxonomy, and QA gates, then deliver a pilot batch in Week 1–2. Many engagements reach a stable “pilot-to-scale” workflow within 2–3 weeks, depending on modalities and edge case complexity. If you already have guidelines and gold data, we can compress timelines; if not, we’ll help you formalize them so outputs remain consistent at scale.
What annotation formats do you support for ML training data?
We support common training and evaluation exports across modalities. Text and RLHF are commonly delivered as JSONL and CSV with rubric fields and traceability. For vision, we can export COCO JSON, Pascal VOC XML, YOLO TXT, and CVAT-style packages. Video work is delivered with timecoded segments and per-frame metadata in JSON/CSV. For 3D/4D, we deliver JSON annotations alongside point cloud sidecars (e.g., PCD/PLY) and sequence manifests. We’ll map outputs to your taxonomy and naming conventions.
What labeling accuracy can you guarantee?
Accuracy depends on task ambiguity and how well-defined the rubric is, but Abaka supports high-accuracy delivery with multi-layer QA and adjudication. For suitable tasks, we can target up to 99% accuracy using calibrated gold sets, reviewer escalation, and measured acceptance thresholds. Where definitions are inherently fuzzy (e.g., subjective categories), we focus on consistency metrics and disagreement reduction, then refine guidelines until agreement stabilizes. You’ll receive QA reporting and an error taxonomy so improvements are measurable.
How do you keep our training data secure?
Abaka uses strict NDAs, segregated secure pipelines, and compliance-aligned operations (SOC 2 and ISO 27001; GDPR/CCPA readiness). Access is controlled to match your requirements, and we maintain audit trails to support internal reviews. Most importantly, we never build models that compete with you—your data remains exclusively yours and is never repurposed, resold, or shared. If you have additional constraints (network restrictions, custom access patterns), we’ll scope them during Day 0–3.
Do you support multilingual data labeling and global coverage?
Yes. Abaka can staff work across 50+ countries, which helps with multilingual and locale-specific labeling needs such as taxonomy localization, cultural nuance, and region-specific edge cases. We support multilingual text labeling, audio transcription workflows, and evaluation tasks for multilingual assistants. For consistent quality, we use language-specific guidelines, calibrate annotators with gold examples, and apply reviewer escalation when ambiguity is high. Deliverables can be normalized to a single schema across languages to simplify training and evaluation.
How is Abaka different from other data labeling companies?
Abaka is designed as a trustworthy data partner for frontier AI, not a generic labeling marketplace. We combine vertically specialized talent, multi-layer QA with adjudication, and Abaka Forge workflows so delivery is repeatable and auditable. On trust, we never build models that compete with you; your data is exclusively yours and is never repurposed, resold, or shared. On compliance, we operate with SOC 2 and ISO 27001-aligned controls and GDPR/CCPA readiness, which reduces risk during procurement and deployment.
Can we request changes to guidelines after the project starts?
Yes—change requests are normal as your model reveals new edge cases. We handle updates through controlled rubric revisions, versioned guidelines, and targeted rework queues rather than redoing everything. When you change definitions or add new labels, we recommend a small recalibration batch to measure disagreement and adjust gold examples. Abaka Forge supports audit trails and batch-level reporting, so you can see exactly what changed, which items were affected, and how quality metrics shift after the update.
Can you run a small pilot before committing to a larger labeling contract?
Yes. A pilot is the best way to validate rubric clarity, QA performance, and export compatibility. Many teams run a pilot in Week 1–2 and use the results to finalize acceptance criteria, sampling, and cost controls. The pilot output includes labeled data plus a QA report that highlights disagreement patterns and edge cases. Once your team approves the rubric and results, we scale delivery without changing the underlying workflow—so production batches remain consistent with what you validated.
Who owns the labeled data and outputs?
You do. Abaka’s operating principle is that your data is exclusively yours—never repurposed, resold, or shared. We work under strict NDAs and maintain clear audit trails and IP provenance for delivered outputs. If the engagement includes data collection, we aim for 0% copyright risk on collected data through provenance controls and documented sourcing. If you need specific contract language around ownership, retention, or deletion windows, we’ll align during kickoff.
What tools and platforms do you use for data labeling?
We use Abaka Forge—our all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, training support, and production workflows across text, RLHF, image, video, and 3D/4D point cloud. Forge standardizes task templates, reviewer queues, and audits, and it supports controlled exports to your systems. Where appropriate, large-model automation accelerates repetitive steps (up to 50x faster for suitable parts of the workflow), while humans remain in the loop for judgment-heavy decisions and QA.
Is there a minimum project size for your ML data labeling agency services?
We support both small pilots and ongoing production programs. Minimum size depends on modality and how much rubric and QA setup is required, but we can often start with a focused pilot batch to validate success criteria before scaling. If your dataset is small but high-stakes (e.g., safety-critical edge cases, expert domains, or evaluation sets), we can scope a reviewer-heavy approach rather than large throughput. Share your modality, target volume, and timeline, and we’ll propose the right minimum scope.