How much does an AI data annotation provider cost?
Pricing depends on modality, complexity, and whether you’re doing training labels or evaluation/RLHF. Abaka uses real, transparent rate cards for common work types—for example, LLM Math/Coding annotation at $18/hr, STEM Generalist at $12/hr, Dense Captioning at $6/hr, and Road Lane labeling at $3/km. For model evaluation, Red Teaming can be $8/eval and Math Capabilities $12/eval. We typically start with a pilot to confirm spec complexity and expected throughput, then propose a scoped plan.
How long does it take to onboard and start labeling?
Most teams can start quickly once the spec and acceptance criteria are defined. A typical timeline is Day 0–3 for scoping and spec alignment, followed by a Week 1–2 pilot to calibrate edge cases and QA. If the pilot meets targets, scale-up often begins in Week 2–3 with larger staffing and repeatable reporting. Timelines vary based on data access constraints, modality (e.g., 3D vs text), and how mature your label taxonomy is.
What data types and formats can you deliver?
Abaka supports text, LLM RLHF, image, video, 3D/4D point cloud, LiDAR + camera fusion, and audio. We deliver in practical, pipeline-friendly formats like JSONL, CSV/TSV, Parquet, COCO-style JSON for vision tasks, and structured JSON for temporal and 3D annotations. During onboarding we align your internal schema and validate it on a small sample to avoid surprises, then keep deliveries versioned as requirements evolve.
How do you ensure annotation accuracy and consistency?
We use a spec-first workflow with explicit edge-case rules, gold sets, and multi-layer QA. Reviewers are calibrated to your rubric, and difficult samples go through adjudication rather than silent rework. Abaka can target up to 99% accuracy on agreed tasks, with QA reporting that surfaces the main disagreement categories so guidelines can be refined. Consistency is treated as an operational metric: we monitor drift, re-calibrate raters when distributions shift, and keep guideline versions traceable.
Is Abaka secure for sensitive enterprise data?
Abaka is designed for enterprise-grade security workflows. We operate with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 alignment and support GDPR and CCPA requirements, strict NDAs, and segregated secure pipelines. Access control, auditability, and clear data handling procedures are built into the engagement so your security review is straightforward. We can also scope projects to limit exposure—using sampling, staged access, and controlled delivery paths when working with sensitive corpora.
Do you support multilingual annotation and global coverage?
Yes. Abaka supports multilingual annotation and evaluation, with coverage across 50+ countries. We can staff language-specific annotators and reviewers and align on locale rules such as spelling normalization, cultural context, and domain terminology. For multilingual RLHF or instruction data, we calibrate raters per language to reduce preference drift. Outputs include language tags and rater metadata when needed, enabling your team to analyze performance by locale and manage long-tail language distributions.
How is Abaka different from other data labeling companies?
Abaka is built for frontier AI teams that need provenance, governance, and quality to scale together. We never build models that compete with you—your data is exclusively yours and is never repurposed, resold, or shared. Operationally, we combine vertically specialized annotators, scholar-network domains, multi-layer QA, and Abaka Forge workflows that accelerate delivery without sacrificing auditability. The goal is to reduce rework and preserve stable evaluation signals as your tasks and rubrics evolve.
Can we change labeling guidelines mid-project?
Yes—change is expected, but it needs structure. We handle change requests through a controlled spec update, versioned guidelines, and a sample-first validation step when the change affects edge cases or schema. We’ll flag whether prior batches require backfill or whether the change can apply only going forward. This prevents “silent shifts” that break training comparability or contaminate evaluation sets. Weekly reporting includes issue categories and recommendations so updates are targeted rather than disruptive.
Do you offer a pilot before a long-term commitment?
Yes. Most teams start with a pilot designed to validate three things: (1) your spec and edge cases, (2) achievable accuracy and QA signals, and (3) delivery formats and operational cadence. Pilots typically run in the Week 1–2 window after scoping and can be sized to match your risk tolerance—small enough to move fast, but representative enough to surface ambiguity. If the pilot meets agreed acceptance criteria, we scale with the same workflow and reporting.
Who owns the annotated data and derived artifacts?
You do. Abaka’s operating principle is that your data is exclusively yours—never repurposed, resold, or shared. We maintain clear provenance and audit trails so ownership and lineage are unambiguous. Deliverables, guideline versions, and QA artifacts are provided to your team as part of the project outputs. If you require specific contractual language around IP ownership, retention windows, and deletion, we can align during onboarding under strict NDAs.
What tools do you use for annotation and QA?
We use Abaka Forge—our all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, and production workflows. It supports multiple modalities (text, RLHF, image, video, 3D/4D point cloud) and integrates automation to speed up routing and review while keeping humans in control of final decisions. The platform supports versioning, audit trails, and QA checkpoints so your team can trace outputs back to the guideline and reviewer context that produced them.
What is the minimum project size to work with an AI data annotation provider?
There’s no one-size minimum, but the most efficient starting point is usually a focused pilot that can validate the spec, QA, and delivery formats. Even small projects benefit from structured onboarding so the labels are consistent and reusable. If your dataset is very small, we’ll recommend a right-sized approach—often prioritizing evaluation-grade quality and clear edge-case rules over raw throughput. If you plan to scale later, we design the pilot to be compatible with production expansion.