How much do Text Annotation Services cost?
Pricing depends on task complexity, domain expertise, and QA depth. For example, Abaka can staff LLM Math/Coding annotation at $18/hr and STEM Generalist work at $12/hr, with structured QA and adjudication in Abaka Forge. Some tasks are priced per unit in other categories (e.g., dense captioning at $6/hr or image editing at $8/hr), but text projects are typically hourly with clear acceptance criteria. Talk to an Expert to scope a pilot and get a line-item quote.
How long does it take to start a text labeling project?
Most teams can start with a scoped pilot in Day 0–3 for schema and access setup, then Week 1–2 for calibration and initial production batches. Moving to scaled production commonly follows in Week 2–3 once guidelines are stable and QA gates are proven. Timelines depend on how mature your taxonomy is and whether you need multilingual coverage or expert escalation. Abaka keeps delivery predictable through versioned guidelines, sampling plans, and weekly reporting.
What text annotation formats do you deliver (JSONL, CoNLL, etc.)?
We deliver common training-ready formats including JSONL, CSV/TSV, and CoNLL-style exports for NER. For RLHF-style work, we provide preference JSONL, rubric score tables, and rater metadata for analysis. If you have an internal schema, Abaka can map to it and include dataset version tags and change logs for reproducibility. Abaka Forge supports structured fields (labels, rationales, spans, attributes) so exports remain consistent across releases.
What accuracy can you achieve for text annotation?
Abaka targets high accuracy through multi-layer QA: gold sets, reviewer adjudication, and calibrated rubrics. For many programs, teams aim for 99% accuracy in critical label categories, with acceptance criteria defined at the start of the engagement. The achievable level depends on label ambiguity (e.g., overlapping intents, nested entities) and guideline maturity. We make accuracy measurable by reporting sampled audits, disagreement drivers, and drift signals weekly so you can intervene before errors scale.
How do you keep my text data secure and private?
Abaka operates with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 aligned controls, strict NDAs, and segregated secure pipelines. Access can be scoped by role, project, and dataset, and we maintain auditability through controlled workflows and versioned exports. Abaka is GDPR and CCPA ready and maintains full IP provenance, including 0% copyright risk on collected data. Importantly, we never repurpose, resell, or share your data, and we do not build models that compete with you.
Do you support multilingual text annotation and native speakers?
Yes. Abaka supports multilingual annotation across 50+ countries with native-speaker staffing and locale-specific guidelines. We can run language-specific rubrics, back-translation checks where helpful, and reviewer adjudication to ensure labels reflect real user intent rather than literal translations. Deliverables include language codes, dialect/register metadata when needed, and consistent label maps across regions. This is useful for global assistants, customer support routing, translation evaluation, and multilingual safety labeling.
How are you different from typical data labeling vendors?
Abaka focuses on frontier AI delivery: scholar-network domain reviewers, a global specialized workforce, and a production platform (Abaka Forge) that enforces QA and change control. We operate with strong security posture and provenance, and we never build models that compete with you. Your datasets remain exclusively yours—never repurposed or resold—reducing governance risk. The result is fewer relabel cycles, clearer acceptance criteria, and datasets that stay consistent as you scale.
Can we change guidelines or label schemas after the project starts?
Yes—change requests are expected in real production. Abaka manages schema evolution through versioned guidelines, label-map diffs, and controlled rollout plans so you can avoid mixing incompatible labels in the same training split. We’ll quantify what needs retroactive relabeling versus forward-only changes, then schedule updates without interrupting throughput. Weekly reporting tracks drift and edge cases so changes are driven by evidence, not guesswork, and your team keeps reproducible datasets for experiments.
Can we run a small pilot before committing to a larger program?
A pilot is the recommended starting point. In Week 1–2, we label a calibration set, validate rubrics, and surface ambiguity drivers (intent overlap, unclear entity boundaries, policy edge cases). You receive sample outputs, QA metrics, and recommendations to tighten guidelines before scaling. This reduces risk and prevents expensive relabel cycles later. Once you sign off on acceptance criteria, Abaka can scale to production in Week 2–3 with the same workflows and audits.
Who owns the labeled data and can you reuse it?
You own the labeled data. Abaka’s trust differentiator is clear: your data is exclusively yours—never repurposed, resold, or shared. We also never build models that compete with you. This applies to your raw inputs, derived annotations, guidelines, and outputs. If you require additional contractual language, Abaka supports strict NDAs and project-specific access controls to ensure your IP, provenance, and governance requirements are met end-to-end.
What tooling do you use for text annotation projects?
We run projects on Abaka Forge—an all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, and production workflows. For text tasks, it supports templated instructions, structured fields, reviewer queues, sampling, and audit trails, plus exports in common ML formats. Forge can also coordinate RLHF workflows and multimodal tasks in the same environment, which helps when your program spans text, image, and evaluation. Credits are available at $0.20 USD each for platform usage where applicable.
What is the minimum project size for Text Annotation Services?
There’s no one-size minimum; Abaka supports both small pilots and large production programs. Many teams start with a calibration set large enough to validate rubrics and measure disagreement (often a few hundred to a few thousand items), then scale once acceptance criteria are proven. If you only need expert review for a narrow domain, we can scope a smaller engagement using scholar-network reviewers. Talk to an Expert and we’ll recommend a right-sized pilot based on your timeline and risk tolerance.