How much does Terminal-Bench benchmark evaluation cost?
We offer transparent, straightforward pricing tailored to task complexity. For instance, Defensive Coding and complex terminal evaluations cost $15/eval, Red Teaming is $8/eval, and standard LLM Math/Coding annotation is $18/hr. You only pay for the exact human intelligence you require, with no hidden platform fees.
How quickly can you scale our evaluation pipeline?
We operate on highly accelerated timelines. Initial scoping takes 0–3 days, followed by a pilot evaluation within weeks 1–2. Once calibrated, we can scale to process thousands of files per day per annotator, reducing your overall preprocessing time by up to 70%.
What data formats do you support for terminal evaluations?
Our Abaka Forge platform handles all data types including Text, Image, and Video. Whether you need to evaluate standard bash script logs, JSON-formatted Chain-of-Thought sequences, or screen recordings of agent execution, we ingest and output in the precise formats your team requires.
How do you guarantee accuracy in complex coding benchmarks?
We rely on our specialized scholar-network reviewers rather than general crowdsourcing. By combining automated Model-as-Judge scoring with rigorous human oversight, we consistently maintain 99% accuracy in evaluating coding, reasoning, and instruction-following tasks.
How do you protect our proprietary code and agent data?
Security is foundational. We are fully SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CCPA compliant. All Terminal-Bench benchmark evaluation work is processed through segregated secure pipelines under strict NDAs, ensuring zero leakage of your proprietary models or internal systems.
Can you evaluate agents operating in different languages?
Yes. With annotators spanning 50+ countries, our scholar network can evaluate command-line outputs, translation capabilities, and agent reasoning in multiple languages, ensuring your frontier models perform seamlessly across a global stage.
Why choose Abaka AI over automated-only benchmark tools?
Purely automated tools often miss nuanced reasoning failures and subtle execution errors in complex terminal tasks. We combine human intelligence with large-model automation, providing nuanced Defensive Coding audits and reliable scoring that automated-only solutions simply cannot match.
Can we update our evaluation criteria mid-project?
Absolutely. We view benchmarking as an iterative process. During our weekly reporting and ongoing quality calibration phases, we welcome feedback and will seamlessly adjust the 6-dimension scoring matrix to align with your model's evolving behaviors.
Do you offer a pilot phase for Terminal-Bench testing?
Yes. Our Week 1–2 pilot evaluation phase is designed to establish baseline metrics and calibrate our reviewers. This ensures our scoring precisely aligns with your internal standards before we scale up the evaluation volume.
Who owns the evaluation data generated?
You do, completely. We guarantee full IP provenance and 0% copyright risk. Your Terminal-Bench benchmark data is exclusively yours—it is never resold, repurposed, or used to train competing models.
What platform do you use for agent evaluation?
We utilize Abaka Forge, our proprietary all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, and evaluation. It handles all modalities and leverages large-model automation to speed up evaluation workflows by up to 50x.
Is there a minimum project size for evaluations?
We support projects of all sizes, from focused pilot testing of specific terminal behaviors to massive, ongoing benchmark scaling. Our elastic scalability means we can accommodate your requirements whether you need a handful of custom evaluations or a comprehensive testing suite.