What is the pricing model for evaluating Terminal-Bench capabilities?
Our pricing is highly transparent and scales with your specific needs. For advanced programming and terminal tasks, we offer specialized evaluators, such as LLM Math/Coding experts at $18/hr, or specific test benchmarks like Defensive Coding at $15/eval and Red Teaming at $8/eval. Abaka Forge credits are available at $0.20/credit.
How fast can you deliver results for the 2026 leaderboard?
We optimize for speed without compromising quality. Most comprehensive benchmark evaluations and red-teaming cycles are completed in just 2-3 weeks. Our Abaka Forge platform uses large-model automation to accelerate workflows by 50x, ensuring rapid iteration for fast-moving leaderboard submissions.
What formats and modalities do you cover for evaluation?
We comprehensively support all necessary formats through the Abaka Forge platform. For terminal and agent benchmarking, we primarily handle Text, Code, JSON, and LLM RLHF data. However, our capabilities extend natively to Image, Video, Audio, and complex 3D/4D Point Clouds for embodied agent tasks.
How do you guarantee 99% accuracy in your scoring?
We achieve 99% accuracy by combining advanced Model-as-a-Judge techniques with multi-layer QA from our scholar-network. Difficult reasoning and coding sequences are meticulously reviewed by domain experts who enforce strict adherence to our rigorous 6-dimensional evaluation framework.
Are your evaluation pipelines secure and compliant?
Yes. Enterprise security is our top priority. Our infrastructure is fully SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified. We enforce strict NDAs, utilize segregated secure pipelines, and maintain compliance with GDPR and CCPA, ensuring your proprietary architecture and model weights are never compromised.
Can you evaluate models in multiple languages?
Absolutely. Our annotator network spans over 50 countries, providing deep linguistic coverage. We evaluate complex terminal interactions, coding capabilities, and agent reasoning natively in dozens of languages, ensuring global capability for your frontier foundation models.
How does Abaka AI differ from other evaluation providers?
Unlike other platforms, we never build models that compete with our clients. We are a self-funded, independently profitable company focused entirely on secure data partnership. We offer 0% copyright risk, full data provenance, and a truly vertically specialized scholar-network that surpasses generic crowd-workers.
Can we update the evaluation matrix during a project?
Yes. Benchmark requirements can shift rapidly. We offer highly agile change management, allowing your team to update evaluation criteria, introduce new adversarial prompts, or adjust tool-calling parameters mid-cycle without causing significant delays or friction.
Do you offer pilot programs for benchmark testing?
Yes, we encourage pilot programs to demonstrate our quality and speed. A typical pilot evaluates a targeted subset of your model's terminal capabilities, allowing you to validate our scholar-grade scoring and Model-as-a-Judge precision before scaling to your full evaluation matrix.
Who owns the rights to the evaluation data?
You retain 100% ownership. Your data is exclusively yours—it is never repurposed, resold, or shared across other client projects. We provide complete IP provenance, ensuring absolute confidence when deploying your benchmark-tested models into commercial environments.
What tools do you use for the evaluation process?
We utilize our proprietary, all-in-one platform: Abaka Forge. It handles the entire lifecycle—from prompt collection and cleaning to human annotation and automated scoring. The platform natively supports multimodal inputs and seamlessly integrates into existing MLOps pipelines.
Is there a minimum volume required to engage your services?
We are built for elastic scalability and can support projects of varying sizes. While our infrastructure easily handles massive volume walls—evaluating millions of interactions—we also accommodate smaller, highly specialized evaluations for niche adversarial testing or defensive coding checks.