How much do supervised learning data solutions cost?
Pricing depends on modality, difficulty, rubric complexity, and the level of expert review required. As reference points, Abaka pricing includes LLM Math/Coding annotation at $18/hr, STEM Generalist at $12/hr, Dense Captioning at $6/hr, and Image Editing at $8/hr. For automotive mapping tasks, Road Lane labeling is available at $3/km. We typically start with a pilot batch to confirm guidelines and QA metrics, then provide a predictable rate card for production so you can forecast cost per dataset version.
How fast can you deliver a supervised training dataset?
Most teams see meaningful delivery within 2–3 weeks, depending on scope and volume. The fastest path is a Day 0–3 scoping phase, followed by a Week 1–2 pilot and calibration round, then scale in Week 2–3. If your rubric is already stable and you have clean input data, we can move faster; if you need new guidelines, heavy edge-case adjudication, or multilingual coverage, we plan a slightly longer ramp. We also support weekly drops for ongoing programs.
What modalities and output formats do you support for supervised learning?
We support text, image, video, audio, 3D/4D point cloud, and LiDAR + camera fusion, plus RLHF-adjacent supervision where helpful. Common outputs include JSONL and CSV for text and conversational data; COCO/YOLO/VOC for image; timeline-based JSONL and frame-indexed exports for video; SRT/VTT for audio; and packaged sensor bundles for 3D and fusion workflows. If you have a custom schema, we can map labels to your internal format and maintain versioned delivery.
How do you ensure annotation accuracy and consistency?
We treat labeling as a controlled process: rubric design, calibration rounds, gold sets, and multi-layer QA. Disagreements are not ignored—they are routed to adjudication with documented decisions, and the rubric is updated under version control. We cap throughput at up to 500 files/day per annotator to reduce rushed work and maintain stable performance. For correctness-critical tasks, we add domain reviewers from scholar-network tracks (e.g., medicine, law, math, coding) so edge cases are handled consistently across batches.
How do you handle security, NDAs, and compliance requirements?
Abaka operates with strict NDAs, segregated secure pipelines, and controls aligned to SOC 2 and ISO 27001, with GDPR and CCPA practices. We can support least-privilege access, audit logging, and environment separation based on your risk posture. For collected data, we provide full IP provenance and 0% copyright risk to reduce downstream legal exposure. If your team has specific requirements (region constraints, tooling restrictions, or additional controls), we scope them during Day 0–3 and reflect them in the delivery plan.
Can you provide multilingual supervised datasets?
Yes. Abaka supports multilingual annotation across 50+ countries, including locale-specific labeling where categories and policies differ by region. We can run language-specific calibration rounds and maintain a shared global schema with documented deviations when needed. This approach helps avoid the common failure mode where labels look consistent on paper but diverge in practice due to cultural or linguistic nuance. Deliverables include consistent exports and documentation so your team can train global models without hidden labeling drift.
How are you different from other data labeling companies?
Two differences matter most for supervised learning programs: trust and process. Abaka is a trustworthy data partner for frontier AI—your data is exclusively yours and is never repurposed, resold, or shared, and we never build models that compete with you. Operationally, we emphasize rubric versioning, measurable QA, and calibrated reviewer layers rather than pure throughput. Combined with Abaka Forge workflow controls and automation, you get repeatable dataset versions your team can audit and reproduce across releases.
What if we need guideline changes or label schema updates mid-project?
Change happens—what matters is controlling it. We run changes through a versioned rubric process, document what changed and why, and define whether prior batches need backfills or whether the change starts from a specific dataset version. We can also create compatibility mappings if your training pipeline needs a stable schema. Weekly reviews help surface drift early, and adjudication outcomes become new rubric rules. This prevents silent shifts that invalidate evaluation and makes your dataset evolution explicit.
Can we start with a pilot before committing to full production?
Yes—pilots are the recommended starting point for supervised learning data solutions. A pilot validates label definitions, edge-case rules, and QA thresholds with real examples before you scale. You’ll receive sample exports in your required formats, plus a quality report and an error taxonomy that reveals where the rubric needs tightening. Once the pilot is accepted, we scale the same workflow and keep the dataset versioned so you can train immediately and expand volume without retooling.
Who owns the labeled data and can you reuse it?
You own your data and outputs. Abaka’s policy is that your data is exclusively yours—never repurposed, resold, or shared. We also do not build models that compete with you, so there is no incentive to extract value from your datasets beyond delivering the project. For collection-driven programs, we provide full IP provenance and a 0% copyright risk approach to reduce downstream exposure. Contract terms and access controls can be aligned to your internal requirements.
What tooling do you use to manage supervised labeling workflows?
We use Abaka Forge—our all-in-one platform for collection, cleaning, annotation, training handoff, and production operations across text, image, video, 3D/4D point cloud, and RLHF. Forge supports workflow routing, reviewer layers, audit logs, and consistent exports. Large-model automation can accelerate throughput up to 50x, while humans handle adjudication and edge cases under a controlled rubric. If your team has existing tools, we can integrate via export/import and maintain your schema.
What is the minimum project size for supervised learning data solutions?
There isn’t a single minimum, but we typically recommend starting with a pilot batch large enough to include edge cases and class imbalance—often a few hundred to a few thousand items depending on modality. This lets us measure disagreement, validate QA gates, and refine the rubric before scaling. If you’re early-stage, we can scope a smaller discovery run focused on guideline design and feasibility. If you’re at production scale, we can plan weekly drops and ongoing refresh to manage drift.