How much does a Model Evaluation project cost?
Pricing is highly transparent and tailored to the complexity of the evaluation metrics. For example, expert Red Teaming is priced at $8/eval, while evaluating advanced Math Capabilities costs $12/eval, and Defensive Coding assessments run at $15/eval. For larger platforms, Abaka Forge credits are just $0.20 USD each. Talk to an expert for a tailored quote based on how you plan to benchmark against the GPT-5.2 GDPval score.
What is the typical timeline for establishing a benchmark?
Most evaluation pipelines are fully operational within 2 to 3 weeks. Day 0-3 involves aligning your goals with our 6-dim framework, followed by scholar onboarding and a rapid pilot phase to guarantee 99% accuracy. Large-scale, continuous benchmarking runs iteratively alongside your model's training schedule.
Which modalities and formats do you support?
Abaka AI natively handles Text, Image, Video, Audio, 3D/4D Point Cloud, and LiDAR data. Output formats are fully customizable, including standard JSON, CSV, Parquet, and COCO-style labels, all seamlessly delivered via the Abaka Forge platform directly into your data pipelines.
How do you ensure 99% accuracy on complex reasoning tasks?
We avoid generic crowdsourcing. Instead, we utilize vertically specialized scholar networks—experts in fields like Lean4 Mathematics, Law, and Coding. By capping workloads at 500 files/day per annotator and utilizing robust Model-as-Judge verification within Abaka Forge, we ensure exceptional accuracy without quality decay.
Are your evaluation environments secure for pre-release models?
Absolutely. We adhere strictly to SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CCPA standards. Your proprietary model API endpoints and pre-release architectures are assessed within entirely segregated, secure pipelines. We operate under strict NDAs to guarantee your IP is never compromised.
Can you evaluate models in multiple languages?
Yes, our network of 1M+ annotators spans over 50+ countries. We provide highly nuanced multilingual evaluations, ensuring that your foundation model accurately understands cultural contexts, idioms, and local sentiments across global deployments.
How does Abaka AI differ from standard benchmarking platforms?
Standard automated platforms suffer from quality decay when assessing frontier models, and basic crowdsourcing lacks domain expertise. We provide a comprehensive 6-dim framework powered by true scholar-grade human intelligence. Furthermore, we are self-funded and never build competing foundation models.
Can we adjust the scoring rubric mid-project?
Yes. Our agile evaluation process allows you to refine objective benchmarks and custom rubrics as your model evolves. Dedicated project managers update the human-in-the-loop guidelines within Abaka Forge, rapidly calibrating our evaluators to your updated requirements.
Do you offer pilot programs for new evaluation metrics?
Yes, every engagement includes an initial pilot phase during Weeks 1-2. This allows us to stress-test your specific rubrics, calibrate our specialized annotators, and ensure the resulting data meets our 99% accuracy threshold before scaling to full production volumes.
Who owns the evaluation data and benchmarks produced?
You retain 100% ownership of all evaluation data, QA layers, and benchmark results. Abaka AI acts solely as your trustworthy data partner. Your data is exclusively yours, backed by full IP provenance—we never repurpose, share, or resell your datasets.
What tooling do your evaluators use?
Our evaluators utilize Abaka Forge, our proprietary, all-in-one platform for data collection, cleaning, and annotation. It leverages large-model automation to streamline complex multimodal workflows, making the human review process up to 50x faster while ensuring uncompromising quality control.
Is there a minimum project size for human evaluation?
We are highly flexible and capable of supporting both targeted, single-domain audits and massive, continuous benchmarking engagements for global enterprise customers. Talk to an expert to discuss how we can right-size an evaluation team for benchmarking against the GPT-5.2 GDPval score.