How much do AI data annotation companies cost per hour or per task?
Pricing depends on modality and expertise, but you should expect transparent rate cards tied to task complexity. Abaka supports real-world pricing such as STEM Generalist labeling at $12/hr and LLM Math/Coding work at $18/hr for domain-skilled reviewers. For vision tasks, options include Dense Captioning at $6/hr and Image Editing at $8/hr. For autonomy lane work, Road Lane tasks can be priced at $3/km. We’ll help you map the right unit to your dataset and quality targets.
How fast can you start and deliver the first labeled batch?
Most teams can start with a scoped pilot in Day 0–3 and receive an initial calibrated batch within 2–3 weeks, depending on security setup, guideline complexity, and modality. Abaka prioritizes early calibration to prevent rework later: we validate rubrics, measure disagreement, and lock acceptance criteria before scaling. After the pilot, we move to weekly releases with predictable throughput and quality reporting so your training and evaluation cycles stay on schedule.
What data types and output formats do you support?
Abaka supports text, LLM RLHF, images, video, 3D/4D point clouds, LiDAR + camera fusion, and audio. Outputs are delivered in standard, training-ready formats such as JSONL/CSV for text and RLHF, COCO-style JSON or YOLO TXT for vision, timecoded formats for video, and structured JSON bundles for 3D and fusion workflows. If your stack uses custom schemas, we can align exports to your field naming, versioning, and metadata requirements.
What annotation accuracy can I expect from Abaka?
Abaka targets 99% accuracy for production programs, achieved through calibrated guidelines, gold sets, multi-layer review, and adjudication for edge cases. The exact measured accuracy depends on your task definition and ambiguity level, so we start with a pilot to quantify disagreement and refine rubrics. We also track error themes over time to prevent drift. The goal isn’t just a one-time score—it’s stable quality across weekly releases as volume, languages, and teams scale.
How do you protect sensitive data during annotation?
Abaka is built for enterprise governance: SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls, GDPR and CCPA alignment, strict NDAs, and segregated secure pipelines. Access is provisioned based on least privilege, and reviewer actions are auditable through Abaka Forge. We also provide full IP provenance and maintain 0% copyright risk on collected data. Importantly, Abaka never builds models that compete with you—your data is exclusively yours and is never repurposed or shared.
Do you support multilingual annotation and non-English languages?
Yes. Abaka operates across 50+ countries with multilingual annotators and domain-capable reviewers, supporting use cases like translation QA, multilingual instruction datasets, regional sentiment, and locale-specific policy evaluation. We help you standardize language-specific guidelines, build balanced sampling across locales, and report quality per language to spot drift early. For multilingual programs, we also recommend a calibration phase per language family to keep rubrics consistent and prevent subtle interpretation errors.
How is Abaka different from other AI data annotation companies?
Many vendors optimize for volume, not for stable, auditable quality. Abaka differentiates on three fronts: (1) domain depth via scholar networks for coding, math, medicine, law, and more; (2) platform rigor through Abaka Forge, which centralizes workflows, QA, and audit trails; and (3) trust posture—Abaka is self-funded, profitable, and never builds models that compete with you. Your data is exclusively yours and is never repurposed, resold, or shared.
What happens when we need guideline updates or change requests mid-project?
Change requests are expected, especially for evolving taxonomies and RLHF rubrics. Abaka manages updates through versioned specs: we document what changed, when it changed, and which batches are affected. We can run targeted relabeling only where needed instead of restarting the entire dataset. In Abaka Forge, issues are tracked and resolved with adjudication notes, so new rules propagate consistently. This prevents “silent drift” that makes training runs incomparable.
Can we run a paid pilot before committing to a larger engagement?
Yes. A paid pilot is the recommended first step for teams comparing AI data annotation companies. We’ll scope a representative sample, define acceptance criteria, and deliver a calibrated batch with QA reporting so you can evaluate quality and iteration speed. Pilots are designed to be reusable—guidelines, rubrics, and schemas carry forward into production. That way, your pilot spend directly de-risks the larger program instead of becoming a one-off experiment.
Who owns the labeled data and can you reuse it?
You own your data and your labeled outputs. Abaka’s posture is explicit: we never build models that compete with you, and your data is never repurposed, resold, or shared. We operate under strict NDAs and segregated secure pipelines, and we can support additional requirements such as project-specific access controls and audit logs. This ensures your datasets remain proprietary assets and can be used confidently across training, evaluation, and product workflows.
What tooling do annotators and reviewers use?
Work is managed in Abaka Forge—an all-in-one platform that supports collection, cleaning, annotation, and production workflows across text, RLHF, images, video, and 3D/4D point clouds. Abaka Forge provides structured task routing, QA layers, adjudication, and export tooling, plus large-model automation to accelerate checks and formatting consistency. Your team gets centralized visibility into progress, quality metrics, and issue themes, rather than juggling disparate tools and spreadsheets.
Is there a minimum project size to work with Abaka?
Abaka can support both small, high-skill pilots and large-scale production programs. The practical minimum depends on whether we’re building new guidelines, setting up secure access, and calibrating reviewers. If your need is narrow (for example, a focused math/coding evaluation set), we can scope a smaller engagement. If you need multi-modal production labeling, we recommend enough volume to justify calibration and QA instrumentation so quality remains stable as you scale.