Template library depth - not template count - is the true determinant of a great AI avatar generator. This guide explains how to evaluate avatar tools for consistency, customization, and identity retention, so you can choose the right platform with confidence.
Template Library Depth - The Determinant of Selecting AI Avatar Generators

How Should We Select AI Avatar Generators Based on Template Library Depth?
Template Library Depth: The Determinant of Selecting AI Avatar Generators
Not all AI avatar tools are created equal. Some give you hundreds of templates but zero consistency. Others give you fewer options but deliver a higher-quality, reliable, and on-brand identity each time.
The secret?
Look at the depth - not just the size - of the template library.
Know your Purpose First
Template libraries only matter when they match your use case. Before choosing a generator, ask:
- What am I creating avatars for?
Social media? Personal branding? Team pages for Corporate?
- What style do I need?
Realistic, semi-realistic, 3D, anime, or vector?
- Static or animated?
Some tools only do headshots, non-dynamic avatars.
Evaluate Breadth
How many styles can the generator do? Look for variety:
- Number of distinct base styles = not just color variations of the same look, but truly different aesthetics like Line Art, Comic, 3D, Professional Corporate visual styles, etc.
- Pose and composition variety = only front-facing headshots available, or do you also get different angles, poses, and scenes (at the office, at home, or in an abstract background)?
- Selection of use-case packs = tools that bundle templates into packs for specific use cases are more powerful than random, unorganized styles
Breadth = Creative Possibilities Unlocked
Evaluate Depth
Going deeper into your evaluation, test and compare different generators based on their depth within your chosen style. Depth is the real determinant of your chosen avatar generator. A deep library allows you to create many versions of the same identity without distortion.
Check for:
(i) Variation within the same character
Can you customize your avatar with:
- Different outfits
- Different scenes/props
- Different moods (serious, smiling, excited)
- Different lighting
If every template changes your identity and face too much, the library is broad but not deep.
(ii) Consistency across outputs
Do you still look like you?
If you generate 10 avatars from different templates, do they look like the same person/character?
(iii) Layer-level control
Can you edit:
- only the background
- only the outfit
- adding accessories (glasses, hat, headphones)
- facial expression
Without distorting your face?
Libraries that allow “micro-variation” inside each template are much more powerful than static, fixed presets.
Depth = Brand Consistency + Professional Quality
Test Identity Retention
Two generators can have 500 templates, but if your face/style doesn’t stay consistent, it doesn’t matter.
To be robust in your evaluation, test each tool this way:
- Upload 3-5 photos of yourself (or a test subject) with different angles, lighting, both neutral and smiling, etc.
- Generate avatars using 3-5 different template styles and several poses and outfits
- Finally, check:
- Identity retention: Do you still look like you in all templates?
- Degradation: Does quality drop when you pick more “creative” templates?
- Bias or distortion: Does the model try to “beautify” you too much, change skin tone, or alter key features?
If the template library is “deep”, it should handle many templates without breaking your identity.
Scoring Checklist
As a final step to your evaluation, you can create a simple rating grid as below. Rate each tool from 1-5:
| Criterion | Score (1-5) |
|---|---|
| Use-Case Fit | 🎯 |
| Variation Depth (outfits, moods, lighting) | 👔 |
| Visual Styles Selection | 🎨 |
| Pose and Background Variety | 📸 |
| Use-Case Packs | 🧩 |
| Identity Consistency | ♾️ |
| Layer Control | 📑 |
Tools with high depth scores will always outperform others with hundreds of shallow templates. Instead, select tools that:
- Have fewer templates but strong internal variation and consistency
- Provide ‘packs’ (e.g. 10 avatars of the same person in different scenarios)
In sum, as a rule of thumb:
Choose the avatar generator where you can apply many different templates to the same identity and still get consistent, on-brand avatars that match your core use case (LinkedIn, content, corporate, etc.).
Look for consistent variation, and don’t fall into the trap of total identity failure!

